Hollywood's embrace of 80s nostalgia continues with the release of the long-awaited, semi-live-action remake of Masters of the Universe, a property that has never successfully transitioned to the big screen. This article delves into the challenges and potential of this reboot, exploring the reasons behind its past failures and the unique charm it possesses today.
The original 1987 film, a Hail Mary attempt to boost toy sales, was a box office flop, underperforming even compared to other fantasy movies of the decade. Its failure can be attributed to several factors, including its release during a time when action and cop movies dominated the box office, and its attempt to bridge the gap between fantasy and reality, which ultimately fell flat.
One of the key differences between the original and the new film is the level of fan service. The 1987 version, despite its flaws, had a certain charm and authenticity to it, with a more honest and cheaper aesthetic that appealed to a nostalgic audience. The new film, on the other hand, is more coherent, prettier, and better-acted, but it also comes across as puffed up with knowing fandom.
The new Masters of the Universe movie embraces its 80s roots, with a soundtrack filled with period hits, a brighter and more garish color scheme, and a love for the cartoon aesthetic. However, it also pushes its luck by setting a significant portion of the story on Earth, which may not be as cost-effective as the fantastical land of Eternia. This decision, while understandable, may also limit the film's ability to fully immerse the audience in the world of He-Man.
Despite its flaws, the new film has the potential to succeed, especially if it can capture the inherent charm of the original. The article concludes by questioning whether the audience's demand for more from a Masters of the Universe movie has increased, or if it's simply a sign of higher expectations at a greater expense. The writer, Jesse Hassenger, reflects on the film's strengths and weaknesses, offering a thoughtful and engaging analysis that will spark discussion among fans and critics alike.
